Getting My h4831sc load data To Work

Your session is going to timeout because of inactivity. Click Alright to increase your time and efforts for an extra 0 minutes.

Obviously, the Hodgdon tech would not endorse my mixing of various whole lot numbers, but I feel I realize why. It is a litigation-driven entire world, and several fool would surely deduce that he could mix H380 and H110 and come up with his own personalized mixture of powder. What a world.

You happen to be correct They are really the identical the SC is short Slice so it meters better, I don't Feel you will get just common 4831 any more

Minnesota H4831SC is my head over to from the 7mm Rem Mag, but I am conserving the tiny I have remaining for slide 2021. I might start low and operate your way up, based on what load data you take a look at for this combo the min/max loads are all over the board.

The only real distinction as I understand it would be that the SC was intended to operate by way of powder steps improved (which it does). The for a longer period grains tend not to feed very well in the least in some steps. Thats my 02 :grin:

I've applied H4831 and H4831SC in my 260 Rem without variation. The only thing will be the brief cut provides a little bit more Place. Superior luck!gun)

I have utilized both of those and utilised the exact same fees and have not been in the position to inform any noticable dissimilarities with functionality. the SC version meters somewhat smoother is about all. any comments??

and you might like to put money into some new load data books. powder composition and chemistry can does adjust through the years. 4831 powder of decades back isn't exact same as precisely what is available. that may be why anyone seriously interested in reloading safely will h4831 vs h4831sc have essentially the most existing load data publications to confer with.

The primary reason I switched from IMR 4831 to H4831 was to take advantage of the temperature insensitivity of a Hodgdon Intense powder.

Why would I point out this? What exactly is my issue? h4831 vs h4831sc I'm unsure that there's a real valid place other than precisely what is popular with most has not been common with me in the slightest degree in these situation. Do I just have a powder jinx or one thing? Only to show you how insane I really am, tomorrow I am selection tests a mates new .

I needed a little bit a lot more myself so I went in advance and grabbed the 8lb jug to get coated for quite a while (and have loads of precisely the same large amount of powder).

The "SC" stands for Quick Minimize. I have not observed a difference between possibly powder dut I do not Consider I would blend them.

I'm sure the H4831SC presents an even better load density But I feel I have sufficient room in my circumstance for the conventional h4831sc load data H4831.

I could stack em in one hole but I wasn’t content with the velocity. Just after months, I obtained lucky and caught some H1000 on the internet and of course paid out a bit extra. The very future 7 days at a gun show a guy experienced a complete circumstance of H1000 for $forty per 1lb. I ignore the amount of, but Using the H1000 I’m now pushing a 160gr about 3200 and it’s a moderate load.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *