While IMR 4831 and H4831SC are distinct powders, you can find that in several scenarios, where by one of these is shown the other will be in addition. Also, you will discover there is a fairly constant marriage involving them with reference to outlined loads.
Of course, the Hodgdon tech wouldn't endorse my mixing of various good deal quantities, but I believe I realize why. It's a litigation-pushed globe, plus some idiot would undoubtedly deduce that he could mix H380 and H110 and think of his own personalized blend of powder. What a entire world.
You're accurate They're a similar the SC is short cut so it meters far better, I do not Assume you can find just regular 4831 anymore
Sweet!! I'll decide on some up and provides it a try out. Thank you men, I appreciate it! I will let you determine what I determine. I do have a few 50 percent pound of 4350 I'm able to test that very first and see what occurs.
IMR powders also preform perfectly for me with just one noteworthy exception. All of the chrongraphing I have performed with them implies the velecity is consistant over 32 degrees but starts to vary once the temp starts to drop. The closer to zero I get the more they fluctuate. I've viewed approximately 250 fps in a 10 shot string with my 243 and 223 while in the Wintertime time all-around here. Haven't seen this with a few of the other powders.
I realize, rough instances. H4831SC will definitely perform, I just failed to like the situation density when loaded prolonged. I don't don't forget powder cost off the very best of my head but I was launching a Berger 168gr VLD at three,000fps which happens to be where by I typically goal to become. Inside your case employing what you may have (and what I must have completed) I would get started with the tip of your bearing floor in the bullet correct within the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there when you discover a velocity node.
i've utilized each and utilised the very same charges and possess not been in a position to convey to any noticable variations with efficiency. the SC Variation meters a h4831sc little bit smoother is about all. any feedback??
Anyhow, I needed to give some 7828SC a try to reduce a lot of the compression. What a blunder, I could not get this powder to shoot correctly or create the velocities I get with conventional 7828.
Along with the short Reduce Model powder will come nearly the base from the decrease shoulder so I nevertheless have a great deal of home.
Ballistically, this Extraordinary Extruded powder is the precise duplicate of H4831. Physically, it has a shorter grain size, therefore, the designation SC or short Minimize. The shorter, a lot more compact kernels allow the powder to flow in the powder steps more effortlessly, assisting to relieve the continuous chopping of granules.
I h4831sc have had related practical experience with H4350. For me, some ball powders will never shoot well with anything at all besides Fed215's. Some elements just Never Perform effectively with other. Looks like you've chosen three superior powders, I'd personally be expecting no less than one of these to shoot.
It's been a bit, but h4831sc load data I did get some 4831 SC to try. Located a node and shot some teams. I shot a .6 5 shot group currently. It is a little bit slower than H1000, but shoots excellent. Many thanks for the advice, It truly is good to are aware that I have received solutions when a single or the opposite powder is dried up.
I typically generally have the sc Variation. Employing a powder evaluate it hangs up less as a result of shorter kernels and I feel makes it possible for additional reliable metering so less time you are taking trickling in the final little bit of demand to help make pounds. So basically the SC will save you situations
NBTs or Hornady VMax, but Have got a minimal provide of Varget, and a ton far more accessible H4831SC. I shoot fifty five gr. loads Virtually completely, mainly because which is just what the rifles shoot the top.